Head-to-head comparison
CSFloat vs BUFF163
A side-by-side look at CSFloat and BUFF163: editorial safety scores, fees, payout options, and track record, pulled from our full reviews of both platforms.
Our verdict
CSFloat comes out ahead in our safety review, scoring 87/100 against 74/100 for BUFF163. The score weighs community trust ratings, unresolved scam reports, domain history, and how the operator responds to problems. On costs, CSFloat takes the smaller seller cut: 2% against 2.5% at BUFF163.
Head-to-head
| Feature |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Score | 87/100 | 74/100 |
| Category | Skin Marketplaces | Skin Marketplaces |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Country | United States | China |
| Supported games | Counter-Strike 2 | Counter-Strike 2 |
| Seller fee | 2% | 2.5% |
| Buyer fee | 0% | Not published |
| KYC required | Not published | Yes |
The contenders
CSFloat
Skin Marketplaces
Peer-to-peer CS2 marketplace that grew out of the popular float-checking tool. Known for a flat 2% seller fee (among the lowest of any major Western platform) and deep float/pattern search.
BUFF163
Skin Marketplaces
The largest CS2 marketplace in the world by volume, operated by NetEase. Over two million active listings and a 2.5% seller fee, though registration effectively requires a Chinese phone number and payouts run through Alipay.
Frequently asked questions
Is CSFloat safer than BUFF163?
CSFloat currently holds the higher SkinJudge Safety Score: 87/100 against 74/100 for BUFF163. Both scores are editorial ratings based on trust reviews, scam reports, domain history, and operator responsiveness.
Which has lower fees, CSFloat or BUFF163?
CSFloat charges sellers 2%, while BUFF163 charges 2.5%. Payout and payment-method costs can differ on top of that, so check each review for the full fee breakdown.
Can I use both CSFloat and BUFF163?
Yes. Plenty of traders keep accounts on several platforms and list where prices or liquidity are better at the moment. Just keep each platform's trade holds and withdrawal rules in mind.
